ZEGOCLOUD Competitors – Comparing the Top 9 Alternatives

Real-time video has shifted from a "nice-to-have" feature to a core building block for modern apps, powering livestreams, virtual events, telehealth, gaming, creator tools, and on-platform communication. ZEGOCLOUD is one of the newer but fastest-growing platforms in this space, offering a broad suite of APIs for interactive video, voice, live streaming, low-latency messaging, and AI-driven enhancements.

But the real-time video ecosystem is crowded, and the right choice depends on much more than video quality. Developer experience, scale, latency guarantees, pricing transparency, global edge networks, open-source control, and built-in moderation can dramatically shape your product's safety, performance, and cost.

In this guide, we compare ZEGOCLOUD to leading alternatives to help you understand how each platform approaches real-time engagement and identify the best fit for your use case.

ZEGOCLOUD Overview

ZEGOCLOUD is a real-time engagement platform offering APIs and SDKs for live video, voice, streaming, and in-app communication. Its focus is on helping developers add interactive features such as group calls, live commerce, virtual events, low-latency chat, AI effects, and real-time co-creation without needing to build custom media infrastructure.

The platform combines low-latency video and audio with extras like cloud recording, noise suppression, smart routing, and AI-powered interactions. While ZEGOCLOUD is relatively newer compared to long-established RTC providers, its breadth of features, competitive pricing, and fast-growing ecosystem make it an increasingly popular choice for developers looking to ship real-time functionality quickly.

Advantages of ZEGOCLOUD

• Broad feature coverage in a single SDK: ZEGOCLOUD consolidates real-time video, voice, chat, streaming, and AI-driven enhancements into a single stack, giving teams a unified way to build interactive experiences without relying on multiple vendors.

• Flexible, cross-platform support: Robust SDKs for Web, iOS, Android, Unity, Unreal, Flutter, React Native, and Electron make ZEGOCLOUD accessible to teams building experiences across devices, engines, and frameworks.

• Low-latency interaction for large audiences: Built-in optimizations for live streaming, video rooms, and interactive events support large-scale use cases like live commerce, virtual stages, and synchronized multi-host sessions.

• Competitive pricing and global reach: ZEGOCLOUD tends to be priced lower than long-established RTC providers, with PoPs and acceleration nodes across multiple regions.

• AI-powered enhancements: Features like noise suppression, background segmentation, beauty filters, and spatial audio let developers add polished, production-quality experiences without needing separate AI providers.

• Fast time to market: Clear documentation, prebuilt UI components, and sample apps allow teams to prototype and launch interactive video features quickly.

Drawbacks of ZEGOCLOUD

• Less proven at massive global scale: While growing quickly, ZEGOCLOUD is newer than long-established RTC providers, which have been battle-tested in large enterprise deployments and extremely high-volume traffic scenarios.

• Limited enterprise ecosystem integrations: Compared with vendors like Twilio or Stream, ZEGOCLOUD offers fewer out-of-the-box integrations for compliance, analytics, CRM, or enterprise workflows. This means some teams may need to build more glue code themselves.

• Smaller community and tooling ecosystem: The platform doesn't yet have the same depth of community resources, third-party tutorials, UI kits, or plugin ecosystems found with competitors like Daily, LiveKit, or Stream.

• Less transparent pricing at higher volumes: Entry-level pricing is competitive, but large-scale or specialized use cases often require contacting sales, making it harder for teams to forecast costs without a direct quote.

• Fewer specialized capabilities for regulated industries: Solutions built specifically for telehealth, education compliance, or financial services may require additional customization when implemented with ZEGOCLOUD.

Main Features

ZEGOCLOUD brings together real-time communication, live streaming, and AI-powered enhancements into a single SDK.

Its key capabilities include:

• Real-time video & voice: Low-latency 1:1 and group audio/video calls with adaptive bitrate streaming, smart routing, and cross-platform SDKs.

• Interactive live streaming: Support for multi-host streaming, live commerce overlays, co-hosting, guest interactions, and large audience participation.

• Ultra-low-latency messaging: In-app chat and signaling features built for real-time collaboration, live events, and synchronized engagement experiences.

• AI-enhanced audio & video: Built-in effects such as noise suppression, background segmentation, beauty filters, and audio optimization to improve production quality.

• Cross-platform developer SDKs: Comprehensive SDKs for Web, iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, Unity, Unreal, Electron, and more—enabling consistent experiences across devices and game engines.

• Cloud recording & playback: Automatic recording of calls and streams with server-side storage, export, and playback options.

• Scalable infrastructure: Global edge presence and distributed streaming architecture to support high concurrency and geolocation-aware delivery.

Primary Use Cases

Developers use ZEGOCLOUD to power real-time experiences in several key verticals. Core use cases include:

• Conversational AI: ZEGOCLOUD's low-latency audio pipeline and cross-platform SDKs help teams build natural, human-like conversational flows for AI agents, virtual assistants, and multimodal experiences. 

• Social & community apps: Enable live rooms, video chats, audio hangouts, virtual events, and co-streaming features.

• Education & online learning: Support live classes, tutoring, virtual classrooms, and collaborative whiteboarding with features like breakout rooms, screen sharing, and AI-enhanced audio.

• Telehealth & remote care: Provide secure, high-quality video sessions for consultations, triage, and follow-up visits.

• E-commerce & live shopping: Enable live product demos, interactive shopping events, and real-time buyer engagement with low-latency streaming and co-hosting features.

• Fitness & coaching: Power live workout sessions, 1:1 coaching, group classes, and hybrid in-person/remote experiences.

ZEGOCLOUD Pricing

ZEGOCLOUD offers à-la-carte pricing based on the specific real-time features you use. Key rates include:

• Voice Call: $0.99 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Video Call: $3.99 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Live Streaming Video: $1.49 per 1,000 minutes

• In-App Chat: $99 for 10,000 MAU per month

• AI Effects: $584 for two platforms per month

• Super Board (collaboration tools): $1.99 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Cloud Recording: $0.59 per 1,000 recording minutes

• Analytics Dashboard: $299 per month

• Content Moderation: Contact sales for pricing

A free trial is available across most products, and pricing can scale based on volume and additional enterprise needs.

What to Consider: ZEGOCLOUD Versus a Competitor

Choosing between ZEGOCLOUD and another real-time video provider often comes down to how much control, scale, and ecosystem depth your product needs. Some platforms focus on global reach and enterprise reliability, while others emphasize developer experience, open-source flexibility, or specialized audio/video quality.

Here are key questions to guide your evaluation:

Do you need one vendor for multiple engagement features?
If you want video, voice, chat, interactive streaming, and AI effects under one platform, ZEGOCLOUD offers strong breadth. But if your product relies heavily on a single capability—like ultra-low-latency video or best-in-class audio—a specialized provider may deliver more depth.

How important is global scale and QoS?
ZEGOCLOUD performs well across regions, but long-established providers have larger, more mature global networks. For mission-critical enterprise applications, those providers may offer stronger SLAs and redundancy guarantees.

Do you need open-source or self-hosted control?
If full ownership of media infrastructure matters, open-source options like LiveKit offer a very different control surface than ZEGOCLOUD's managed cloud stack.

Is your team optimizing for speed of implementation or long-term flexibility?
ZEGOCLOUD's SDKs, UI kits, and quick-start flows can help you ship rapidly. Platforms like Daily, Stream, or VideoSDK also emphasize developer experience, while enterprise solutions like Twilio or Vonage require more configuration but offer stronger compliance pathways.

What's your budget, and how predictable should it be?
ZEGOCLOUD's pricing is competitive, but volume-based usage can make long-term forecasting tricky. Providers like Mux sometimes offer more predictable, streaming-focused models, while developer-first APIs (Daily, Stream) offer transparent pricing that's easier to estimate during prototyping.

Top 9 Alternatives

ZEGOCLOUD vs. Stream

Stream provides real-time video, audio, and chat APIs with a strong emphasis on developer experience, in-app interactivity, and reliability at scale. Instead of trying to cover every possible engagement feature, Stream focuses on building high-quality, low-latency communication with clean SDKs, polished UI kits, built-in moderation, and consistent cross-platform behavior. Product teams choose Stream when they want to embed video and chat directly into their app with minimal complexity (and maintain predictable performance as they scale).

Stream Versus ZEGOCLOUD

While both platforms offer real-time video and audio, they diverge meaningfully in focus and execution. ZEGOCLOUD is built for breadth: it bundles video, voice, chat, live streaming, AI effects, and collaboration tools into a single stack. This makes it appealing for teams that want a wide range of engagement features from one vendor, especially in social, creator, or gaming apps that rely on multiple real-time components.

Stream, by contrast, prioritizes depth, reliability, and developer experience. Its video and audio APIs integrate seamlessly with Stream's chat and feeds, and the platform provides polished UI kits, strong documentation, and integrated AI moderation. The result is a more cohesive, predictable developer workflow, which is ideal for teams that value stability and product polish over having every possible feature included by default.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• Broad set of engagement features, including video, voice, chat, streaming, AI effects, and collaboration tools under one vendor.

• Fast time to market with prebuilt UI, starter kits, and lower entry costs for early-stage teams.

• Versatile for social, creator, and interactive apps that rely on multiple real-time features.

Stream Advantages: 

• Developer-first APIs and UI kits that dramatically reduce build time and complexity.

• Reliable, low-latency infrastructure designed for real-time communication at scale.

• Integrated safety and moderation across video, chat, and community features—ideal for apps where user trust and experience matter.

Stream Pricing

Stream offers usage-based pricing for its Video product, with clear published rates and $100 in free monthly credits for development and testing.

 Key rates include:

• Video Audio: $0.30 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Video HD: $1.50 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Livestreaming Audio: $0.12 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Livestreaming HD: $1.00 per 1,000 participant minutes

Enterprise plans are also available for teams that need volume discounts, higher SLAs, or custom usage patterns.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. Agora

Known for its ultra-low latency, dense worldwide edge network, and ability to handle massive concurrency, Agora has long been the default choice for large-scale applications such as live commerce, interactive broadcasts, social audio, mobile gaming, and international video calling. Its infrastructure is built for stability at global scale, and it offers a deep ecosystem of extensions, SDKs, and enterprise-grade tooling developed over more than a decade.

Agora Versus ZEGOCLOUD

Agora is designed for mission-critical global performance. Its SD-RTN architecture allows the platform to optimize packet routing at the infrastructure level, something only a handful of RTC vendors can do.

For companies operating in geographically distributed markets (Southeast Asia + North America + LATAM, for example), or for apps that must stay stable in low-bandwidth environments, Agora's network-level intelligence is the primary differentiator. It's engineered to perform predictably when scale, geography, and network variability all interact at once.

ZEGOCLOUD, meanwhile, performs strongly in many regions but doesn't operate its own dedicated global routing fabric. Instead, its appeal lies in its developer-facing stack: modern SDKs, strong cross-platform support, and a broad set of features that help teams build interactive apps quickly.

ZEGOCLOUD is a fit for teams that want accessible real-time functionality (video calls, streaming, chat, and AI effects) without navigating the complexity or cost structure of a long-established high-end RTC provider like Agora.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• All-in-one feature set including video, voice, chat, AI effects, and live streaming.

• Fast integration with simpler SDKs and prebuilt UI components.

• Competitive pricing for teams shipping quickly or launching multi-feature apps.

Agora Advantages:

• Highly mature global network with industry-leading low latency and geographic coverage.

• Strong performance for large-scale, international, or mission-critical applications.

• Deep ecosystem of extensions and enterprise tooling built over more than a decade.

Agora Pricing

Agora uses a consumption-based pricing model with rates varying by media type and region.

Key published pricing includes:

• Video: $3.99 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Audio: $0.99 per 1,000 participant minutes

• Broadcast Streaming: $0.59 per 1,000 participant minutes

Enterprise discounts and custom plans are available for high-volume or specialized use cases.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. Twilio Video

Twilio Video is a WebRTC-based platform designed to help developers build high-quality, customizable video experiences using Twilio's global infrastructure. Twilio now emphasizes media quality (HD video, adaptive bitrate), global reliability, flexible room types, and simple SDKs rather than its broader communications ecosystem.

Twilio Versus ZEGOCLOUD

Twilio is built around quality, control, and consistent global delivery. The platform provides high-definition video, simulcast, bandwidth optimization, track-level APIs, and robust infrastructure backed by Twilio's worldwide network.

Developers can choose from peer-to-peer rooms, group rooms, and small-group configurations depending on performance needs. Twilio's SDKs give teams more control over media behavior than most managed RTC platforms, making it attractive for products where video experience quality is a core part of the product.

ZEGOCLOUD, meanwhile, focuses on end-to-end real-time engagement features rather than deep media customization alone. While it also delivers solid media quality, ZEGOCLOUD's differentiator is the range of features, cross-platform tooling, and how quickly teams can assemble complete in-app experiences.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• Unified real-time engagement: video, voice, chat, AI effects, whiteboarding, and live streaming.

• Fast time-to-market with prebuilt UI kits.

• Ideal for social, creator, and consumer apps with many interactive components.

Twilio Advantages:

• High-quality video with adaptive bitrate, simulcast, and track-level control.

• Flexible room types (P2P, Group, Small Group) for performance tuning.

• Strong global infrastructure and predictable media delivery.

Twilio Pricing

Twilio uses metered, usage-based pricing with separate charges for media, recording, and bandwidth. Key example rates include:

• Video Calling: $0.004 per participant minute

• Video Transcription: $0.027 per room per minute

Higher-volume and enterprise plans offer custom discounts and enhanced SLAs.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. Daily.co

Daily.co (Daily) is a modern real-time video platform built around pure WebRTC, deep browser support, and a developer experience optimized for rapid iteration. Daily's API philosophy is minimalist and flexible: it gives engineers building video products extremely granular control over layouts, tracks, permissions, and client behavior.

Daily.co Versus ZEGOCLOUD

Both Daily and ZEGOCLOUD enable real-time video, but they cater to different types of builders and product environments.

ZEGOCLOUD emphasizes breadth and convenience. It provides communication features and co-creation tools in one platform, giving teams a wide set of building blocks without needing multiple vendors.

Daily, by contrast, is built for precision and developer control. Its APIs give teams the ability to construct highly custom layouts, control individual media tracks, shape complex multi-participant experiences, and work natively within the constraints and powers of WebRTC.

Daily's documentation and tooling are exceptionally strong, and its product is engineered for "inherit the browser, don't fight it" — which appeals to teams building specialized collaboration or workflow-heavy products like virtual classrooms, whiteboard tools, design collaboration apps, and remote work platforms.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• All-in-one real-time platform offering video, voice, chat, AI effects, and collaboration tools.

• Faster initial integration with prebuilt UI kits and broad device/framework support.

• Ideal for teams shipping feature-rich social or creator apps.

Daily.co Advantages:

• Granular API and track-level control for building complex, custom video experiences.

• Best-in-class WebRTC support with modern tooling and developer-first documentation.

• Ideal for collaboration, productivity, or workflow-driven products requiring precise control.

Daily.co Pricing

Daily uses transparent, usage-based pricing with generous free allowances for development and prototyping:

• Video & Audio: $0.0015 per participant minute

• Cloud Recordings: $0.013 per recorded minute

• Live Streaming (RTMP): $0.015 per minute

Enterprise plans offer custom SLAs, volume discounts, and advanced features.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. Vonage Video API

Vonage Video API is one of the longest-standing real-time video platforms. It's especially well-known for powering HIPAA-compliant telehealth, virtual classrooms, customer support workflows, and secure enterprise communications. Vonage's strength comes from a decade of infrastructure refinement, stable cross-platform SDKs, and deep support for compliance, interoperability, and long-running production environments.

Vonage Versus ZEGOCLOUD

While ZEGOCLOUD emphasizes speed, feature breadth, and modern developer ergonomics, Vonage is built for enterprise-grade reliability and compliance. Its SDKs are stable across browsers, mobile devices, and embedded platforms.

Additionally, Vonage stands out for regulated verticals, with strong HIPAA support, SOC 2 compliance, long-term uptime guarantees, and the ability to integrate video deeply into customer support, healthcare portals, or educational systems.

Vonage may require more configuration than ZEGOCLOUD, but it offers predictability, regulatory alignment, and operational maturity that enterprises rely on.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• Broad real-time engagement suite including video, chat, live streaming, and AI effects.

• Faster integration and iteration for social, creator, and consumer-side apps.

• More accessible pricing for startups and rapidly evolving products.

Vonage Advantages:

• Enterprise and compliance-ready (HIPAA, SOC 2, strong audit support).

• Long track record of reliability across healthcare, education, and customer support.

• Mature SDKs and backend tooling built for stability and interoperability.

Vonage Pricing

Vonage offers a metered usage pricing model, with published baseline rates such as:

• Video: $0.0041 per minute

• HLS Streaming: $0.00155 per viewer minute 

Enterprise packages include custom SLAs, dedicated support, and compliance-focused features.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. VideoSDK

VideoSDK is a modern real-time engagement platform that offers APIs and SDKs for video calling, live streaming, interactive events, and collaborative experiences. It gives teams granular control over layouts, UI behavior, live interactivity, and event-driven workflows. As such, VideoSDK has quickly gained traction among startups and SaaS products that need a customizable alternative to heavier RTC providers.

VideoSDK Versus ZEGOCLOUD

VideoSDK is engineered for builders who want freedom, not just features. Its event-driven SDKs expose granular control over media tracks, participant states, permissions, live reactions, interactive widgets, and room logic. That flexibility attracts teams who want to craft video experiences that don't look or behave like out-of-the-box calling apps.

For example, this might include multi-host livestreams with interactive overlays, dynamic layouts that adapt to user roles, or custom integrations with product workflows.

ZEGOCLOUD, by contrast, focuses on ease, consistency, and predictable UX. Its SDKs provide standardized patterns and ready-made UI components that help teams ship communication features quickly while maintaining stable performance across devices and frameworks.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• Provides consistent, ready-to-use interaction patterns that reduce UI and state-management overhead.

• Cross-platform SDKs with predictable behavior across mobile, web, and game engines.

• Strong fit for teams building consumer-facing apps where speed and UX consistency matter.

VideoSDK Advantages:

• Highly composable SDKs for teams that want to design custom video workflows and interaction models.

• Event-driven architecture ideal for interactive apps, virtual events, and multi-host experiences.

• Great for developers who want control over layout, role-based permissions, and participant state logic.

VideoSDK Pricing

VideoSDK uses transparent usage-based pricing:

• Video Calls: $0.003 per participant minute

• Audio Calls: $0.0006 per participant minute

• Livestreaming: $0.0015 per viewer minute

Enterprise plans include volume discounts, premium support, and customizable SLAs.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. LiveKit

LiveKit is an open-source real-time communications stack that gives teams full ownership of their infrastructure. It appeals to engineering-forward organizations that want to run their own media servers, optimize SFU performance, control routing, customize codecs, or deploy RTC workloads on-prem, in private clouds, or across hybrid environments. LiveKit is effectively an RTC engine you can tune at the network and resource level, something few providers offer.

LiveKit Versus ZEGOCLOUD

LiveKit and ZEGOCLOUD approach real-time video from opposite ends of the spectrum.

LiveKit is for teams that want control. It lets you control your own SFUs, choose infrastructure, reduce unit economics by optimizing compute, and build RTC as a first-class part of your architecture. It excels in scenarios where customization, latency path tuning, or cost efficiency at scale matter more than out-of-the-box features.

Teams building high-load or specialized video experiences (multiplayer games, virtual spaces, or infrastructure-heavy apps) often prefer LiveKit because they want control over the entire media pipeline.

ZEGOCLOUD, by contrast, is for teams that want managed infrastructure and don't want to maintain media servers or worry about deployment topology, bandwidth shaping, or SFU scaling.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• Fully managed RTC service with no infrastructure to deploy or maintain.

• Faster time to production without deep RTC expertise.

• Strong fit for teams focused on application features, not media server engineering.

LiveKit Advantages:

• Full control over infrastructure, scaling topology, and cost optimization.

• Open-source flexibility with self-hosting, multi-cloud, and on-prem options.

• Deep customization for advanced RTC scenarios like multiplayer, metaverse, and real-time collaboration.

LiveKit Pricing

LiveKit offers both self-hosted (free) and cloud-hosted options. For teams using LiveKit Cloud, pricing is organized into four tiers:

• Build — $0/month: Agent deployment, observability, global edge network, inference credits, one free telephony number, session metrics, and community support.

• Ship — Starting at $50/month: Everything in Build, plus team collaboration, instant rollback to previous deployments, and email support.

• Scale — Starting at $500/month: Everything in Ship, plus role-based access, metrics export APIs, region pinning, and security reports/HIPAA features.

• Enterprise — Custom pricing: Everything in Scale, plus volume pricing, shared Slack channel, SSO, and enterprise-grade support SLAs.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. Dolby.io

Dolby.io is a real-time media platform rooted in Dolby's decades of expertise in audio science, signal processing, and broadcast-grade media quality. Unlike most RTC providers that start with networking or communication primitives, Dolby.io starts with media fidelity, offering advanced noise reduction, spatial audio, bandwidth-adaptive enhancements, audio leveling, and AI-powered cleanup tools.

Dolby.io Versus ZEGOCLOUD

Dolby.io is designed for applications where media quality itself is the product. If you're building a music collaboration tool, a fitness class with instructor voice clarity, a conferencing app that requires "studio-like" sound, or a social audio experience where voices must be crisp in noisy environments, Dolby.io's audio pipeline is unmatched.

The platform's unique selling points are its audio innovations: Dolby Voice, spatial rendering, denoising, automatic gain control, audio leveling, and content enhancement APIs. Dolby.io also shines for content transformation workflows (podcast cleanup, transcription, post-production quality lifts) that go beyond live interactions.

ZEGOCLOUD, in contrast, prioritizes interactive features and real-time experiences rather than high-end audio post-processing. While it offers noise suppression and background effects, ZEGOCLOUD focuses more on real-time engagement.

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• Broad interactive capabilities including video, live streaming, and co-creation tools.

• Strong cross-platform SDKs for mobile, web, Unity, and Unreal.

• Better suited for social, gaming, or creator apps where interactivity comes first.

Dolby.io Advantages:

• Best-in-class audio quality powered by Dolby Voice, spatial audio, and AI enhancement.

• Media processing APIs for post-production, cleanup, and transformation.

• Ideal for apps where sound fidelity is central: fitness, music, conferencing, education, social audio.

Dolby.io Pricing

Dolby.io no longer publishes detailed per-minute or per-unit pricing for its real-time or media processing APIs. Pricing varies based on usage volume, features (real-time interactivity vs. media enhancement), and enterprise requirements. Most teams will need to contact Dolby.io sales for an exact quote.

ZEGOCLOUD vs. Mux

Mux is a developer-focused video infrastructure platform built for on-demand streaming, live broadcast workflows, encoding, storage, delivery, and analytics. Rather than providing real-time video calling or interactive RTC capabilities, Mux specializes in helping teams upload, transcode, stream, and analyze video at scale with exceptional playback quality across devices and bandwidth conditions.

Mux Versus ZEGOCLOUD

Mux and ZEGOCLOUD solve fundamentally different problems, even though both are used for "video."

Mux is built for asynchronous and semi-live video, not real-time interaction. Its strength lies in its video pipeline: adaptive bitrate streaming, global CDN delivery, high-efficiency encoding, thumbnail generation, playback analytics, viewer QoE metrics, and rock-solid reliability for large video libraries.

If your product requires uploading video-on-demand content, providing high-quality playback across devices, or running broadcast-style live streams that reach thousands or millions of viewers, Mux is one of the strongest solutions on the market.

ZEGOCLOUD, in contrast, is built for real-time interaction. Think live video calls, multi-host events, interactive streaming, voice chat, and low-latency experiences where participants communicate with each other in the moment. While it supports live streaming, its strengths are in two-way or many-way communication, in-app engagement, and interactive features (co-hosting, AI effects, audience participation).

ZEGOCLOUD Advantages:

• Purpose-built for real-time video, audio, chat, and interactive live streaming.

• Supports multi-user, low-latency experiences and in-app engagement.

• Strong for social, creator, and communication-heavy applications.

Mux Advantages:

• Best-in-class video pipeline for uploading, encoding, and streaming on-demand or broadcast-style content.

• Rich video analytics, playback optimization, and viewer experience tooling.

• Ideal for products with large VOD libraries or large-scale streaming needs.

Mux Pricing

Mux offers three pricing options:

• Free — $0/month: 100,000 monthly delivery minutes, up to 10 stored videos, on-demand only.

• Pay as You Go: 100,000 delivery minutes before usage credits apply, no storage limits, supports on-demand and live video, plus a $20 monthly usage credit.

• Pre-Pay Plans:

  • Launch: $20/month for $100 in credits

  • Scale: $500/month for $1,000 in credits

  • Both include 100,000 free delivery minutes per month.

Enterprise pricing is available for high-volume needs.

Alternatives Comparison Chart

Is ZEGOCLOUD Right For You? 

ZEGOCLOUD is a strong fit for teams that want to build interactive, consumer-facing real-time experiences without managing RTC infrastructure themselves.

However, it's not the only approach to real-time video. If your priorities lean toward global reliability at massive scale, enterprise compliance, open-source ownership, or advanced audio fidelity, other providers may offer a better match. Platforms like Stream, Agora, and LiveKit each deliver deeper specialization in areas where ZEGOCLOUD is intentionally more general-purpose.

Most of the competitors in this guide offer free tiers or trial credits, making it easy to evaluate the experience firsthand. The right platform ultimately depends on whether you need versatility for interactive features or precision for a specific kind of real-time workload.